Search found 53125 matches
- Mon Nov 19, 2007 7:30 pm
- Forum: IBM QualityStage
- Topic: Dynamically setting investigation ruleset?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1104
I'm fairly certain it can't be done up to version 7.5. I can't think of any way to do it in version 8 either - there's no capacity, for example, to make the Rule Set a job parameter. Of course, if there were a finite (and small) number of possible Rule Sets that you wanted to use, then a job that us...
- Mon Nov 19, 2007 5:14 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Generating Sequence numbers in Parallel Transormer
- Replies: 20
- Views: 7994
- Mon Nov 19, 2007 5:12 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Transformer processing rows
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1204
Will I be able to access stage variable from parallel job into this routine? Not easily. But you can write the value into a file and access that from your after-job subroutine. Or, if you want to code it, you could load the count into the job's user-status area, and access that from the after-job s...
- Mon Nov 19, 2007 5:00 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Transformer processing rows
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1204
Also I cannot see your entire message. Can you please have your entire message displayed? Certainly, by you purchasing a premium membership. For less than 30c per day you can then see the entirety of posts by the five premium posters, and have access to extra goodies for example in the Learning Cen...
- Mon Nov 19, 2007 2:46 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Generating Sequence numbers in Parallel Transormer
- Replies: 20
- Views: 7994
- Mon Nov 19, 2007 2:44 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: How to Write One row of dyanamic data from the query result
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1002
- Mon Nov 19, 2007 2:15 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Invalid character value for cast specification
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3537
You must construct all timestamps in the format that SQL Server will expect. I note that your table structure does not include a column called datetime. I also note that the timestamps specify milliseconds, which you are not providing. Finally, I note that the timestamps you are providing appear to ...
- Mon Nov 19, 2007 2:10 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Sequence forced restart
- Replies: 12
- Views: 3325
- Mon Nov 19, 2007 2:09 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Error "Issuing abort after 50 warnings logged"
- Replies: 5
- Views: 6721
- Mon Nov 19, 2007 2:06 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Transformer processing rows
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1204
- Mon Nov 19, 2007 2:04 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: How to include Header row in sequential file
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1565
- Mon Nov 19, 2007 2:01 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: informatica to datastage logic conversion
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1489
- Mon Nov 19, 2007 1:55 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Which collection Algorithm will work fast in collector?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1243
- Mon Nov 19, 2007 1:53 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Which collection Algorithm will work fast in collector?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1243
- Mon Nov 19, 2007 1:52 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Server job in running state
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2264
Nothing happening is always a tough one to diagnose. Are there any processes running that have DSD.RUN or DSD.StageRun in the command being executed? These will be job or Transformer stage programs respectively. If they are not there, the job processes may have been killed somehow, without getting t...