Search found 53125 matches
- Sat Mar 22, 2008 3:05 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Sorting In teradata Enterprise Stage
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1368
- Fri Mar 21, 2008 7:03 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Filter data based on emp_id
- Replies: 13
- Views: 4305
- Fri Mar 21, 2008 7:02 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: lookup file sets
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1255
- Fri Mar 21, 2008 7:01 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: sequential file splitting
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1380
- Fri Mar 21, 2008 5:38 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: value in decimal field with leading zeros
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2120
Yes and no. Yes. The values can certainly be written into Decimal data type. No. Decimal numbers are stored in binary format. The only data types in which you can store leading zeroes are string data types. When View Data displays Decimal data, it adds leading zeroes so that you can be reminded of t...
- Fri Mar 21, 2008 5:34 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: lookup anamolky
- Replies: 19
- Views: 3909
Welcome aboard. :D Are the output columns from the Lookup stage defined as nullable when you're not using the Transformer stage? Lookup stage does not - of itself - drop null non-key columns, but no stage will write null into a Not Null column unless null-handling properties (such as substitute "in-...
- Fri Mar 21, 2008 5:29 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: removing duplicates
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1194
- Fri Mar 21, 2008 5:28 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Filter data based on emp_id
- Replies: 13
- Views: 4305
Build the output rows in a Transformer stage and use an output constraint of emp_id = 1043 or emp_id = 1059. (I've assumed your input is sorted as shown - if not, sort it.) Some of these rows will be partially incomplete. The final row in each group (that is, for each keyID) will be complete. Downst...
- Fri Mar 21, 2008 5:24 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Performance issue
- Replies: 23
- Views: 11039
- Fri Mar 21, 2008 5:22 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Question on Comparing DataStage Jobs
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2804
- Fri Mar 21, 2008 5:19 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Should i Repartition or Not?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1248
"Blocking" stage types, like Sort and Aggregator, necessarily "interfere with pipeline partitioning" - it's unavoidable. Basically they can not output their first row as soon as the first input row has arrived - they have to wait until the sorting or grouping has been completed. Partitioning is unre...
- Fri Mar 21, 2008 5:17 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Sorting In teradata Enterprise Stage
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1368
- Fri Mar 21, 2008 5:14 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: removing duplicates
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1194
At DSXchange we prefer a more professional standard of written English, the same as you would use when documenting your work. DSXchange is not a mobile telephone. People whose first language is not English have a hard enough time understanding well-written English - they experience added difficulty...
- Fri Mar 21, 2008 5:08 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: server to parallel mig
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1355
Try derivations like
Technically the parentheses around the concatenation expression are not required - I use them merely to show that a sub-expression exists.
Code: Select all
Right(("000000000" : Trim(CL_ID_Lnk.P_SSN)), 9)Technically the parentheses around the concatenation expression are not required - I use them merely to show that a sub-expression exists.
- Fri Mar 21, 2008 5:05 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Difference Between Lookup and join stage
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4208
Re: Difference Between Lookup and join stage
what is the main difference between Lookup and Join Stage. There are many differences. Who are we to decide which is the main one? Is this an interview question? They are different. That's enough. A spanner and a wrench are different, though they perform similar tasks. What the main difference betw...