Search found 53125 matches
- Tue Apr 08, 2008 3:08 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Difference between Set and Propagate Partitioning?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2987
- Tue Apr 08, 2008 3:06 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Creating a library callable from buildop OR transformer
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2159
- Tue Apr 08, 2008 3:04 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: JobMonApp
- Replies: 2
- Views: 977
- Tue Apr 08, 2008 3:03 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: why lookup reference link requires entire partition method?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2972
- Tue Apr 08, 2008 3:01 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: RT_SCTEMP/job_INSERT_INVOICE_SECTION_STATUS_CABS.100556.fifo
- Replies: 13
- Views: 5064
It would appear that two jobs have generated the same pipe filename. This is odd, as the numeric component should be the process ID. But, if you are using an O/S with large pids and the name only uses the rightmost six characters, I guess there's a chance of this happening. Involve your support prov...
- Tue Apr 08, 2008 2:55 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Datastage Server Job & DB2 issue
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2731
Please check that the components of the table name are being spelled correctly in the SQL that DataStage sends - the easiest way is to inspect the job log. The message suggests to me that table GODSLDPF is not defined for owner (schema) GLOTEMLIB, at least for the user ID that the DataStage job is u...
- Tue Apr 08, 2008 2:52 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: DS8.0 & DB2 V8 Compatability Issues - while Migration
- Replies: 1
- Views: 794
You can not use DB2 version 8 for the common Repository; it must be DB2 version 9. Therefore you probably have DB2 Client version issues. Similarly the common Repository requires Oracle version 10g so an appropriate version of Oracle client software is needed for that if Oracle is your DBMS of choice.
- Tue Apr 08, 2008 2:50 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: From Server edition To Parallel Extender (Enterprise)
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1035
You already have Enterprise Edition. As soon as you license it, all the parallel stages will magically appear. That is the end of the magic, however; your server jobs will remain as they are - server jobs, and will continue to work the same way that they do now. Parallel jobs, as you will discern by...
- Tue Apr 08, 2008 2:44 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Constants
- Replies: 2
- Views: 728
I like to initialize stage variables and never re-evaluate them as each row is processed. If it's in code, of course, you have EQUATE and $DEFINE declarations, which you can load up in to header files (blah.H), most easily in the DSU_BP or DSINCLUDE directory. But you have to remember to migrate the...
- Tue Apr 08, 2008 2:41 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: NLS Problem?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 9503
You left out the grep ! Anyway, this shows that NLS is not currently installed.
When you can get exclusive access to the project, execute the following command:
When you can get exclusive access to the project, execute the following command:
Code: Select all
DS.REINDEX ALL- Tue Apr 08, 2008 2:35 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: DataStage EE Hardware Configuration Doubt.
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1369
- Tue Apr 08, 2008 6:26 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Requirement to run the perl script in between parallel jobs
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1138
- Tue Apr 08, 2008 6:25 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: why lookup reference link requires entire partition method?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2972
- Tue Apr 08, 2008 6:22 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: adding condition in Lookup Stage
- Replies: 7
- Views: 6011
- Tue Apr 08, 2008 6:21 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Field Mark, Value Mark, and Subvalue Mark in dynamic arrays
- Replies: 2
- Views: 875
The last one first; the MINIMUM and MAXIMUM functions ignore differences in the separators. Which is what the example was trying to show. The different marks provide levels of hierarchy. A dynamic array may have as many as eight levels of hierarchy but let me describe the usual three, since these ar...