DSXchange

Can you look at JOB.1021461082.DT.1448842784.TRANS5 in RT_BP2814 around line 558, in particular you are looking for anything that looks like a "close" or end of loop. Also look for the name of the stage represented by this code (the stage name is a comment near the beginning). It appears that there ...

DSSendMailTester is provided precisely so that you can inspect the code and thereby learn the correct syntax for invoking DSSendMail().

Please do so.

Yes. The "#" characters do not appear when a parameter name is used in an expression.

Find out what has changed. Have "they" upgraded/patched the operating system? Is there a DataStage patch that has been applied? A SIGSEGV at address 0 is a very curious error - it would definitely be worth involving your support provider. Maybe your dsjob executable has become corrupted.

Just sometimes the internal diagnostics need to invoke sed or dbx (though why I don't know - there's never any apparent output from either command in the logs). If you make sure that the parent directories of these commands are in the DataStage processes' command search path (that is, PATH as config...

A protected project has higher precedence than the READONLY flag.

Welcome aboard.

I doubt that this combination is possible; I believe the installation will fail with a message like "this is not a supported operating system".

Moderator: please move to General forum

So long as you're very careful to look everywhere! A parameter name can appear in an expression, but is only a parameter name if it is not enclosed within quotes (in which case it is a literal string).

Aero. Isn't that a chocolate bar?

One where you spend your hard earned on air rather than chocolate?

No idea, since DataStage is not supported on Vista. But do you really have to close Designer? Would not minimizing Designer (and all other open windows) be enough to expose the modal dialog? Maybe just clicking Show Desktop would do it.

Was this run on a two-node configuration file, with one row being processed on each?

UNIX-style terminator specified when DOS-style terminator actually used?