Search found 53125 matches
- Mon Aug 18, 2008 7:13 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Meaning of a.v
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1144
- Mon Aug 18, 2008 7:11 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: String to timestamp
- Replies: 7
- Views: 6520
In the Administrator client you can set default date, time and timestamp formats for the project (and the default decimal placeholder character). It is these that are used if no format string is provided, for better or worse. The Transformer stage is documented in the Parallel Job Developer's Guide ...
- Mon Aug 18, 2008 4:10 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Record count to be sent in Dssendmail subroutine
- Replies: 9
- Views: 3038
- Mon Aug 18, 2008 2:36 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Food for thought - Pivoting
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1161
Why not? You're expecting to get 200 rows in this case. The columns will only be visible within DataStage, nowhere else. If you were prepared to use a server job, you could use the multi-value handling and dynamic normalization capability of a hashed file to solve this for an arbitrary number of col...
- Mon Aug 18, 2008 2:30 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: How to define hardware configuration for 10 million records
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1509
I can recall being asked to install DataStage on a 286 processor with 4MB of memory because that was the "standard in-house configuration". Go the bean counters! IBM's recommendation would potentially need to be triplicated if you want HACMP plus 24x7 operation or, at the very least, to have all dis...
- Mon Aug 18, 2008 1:56 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Food for thought - Pivoting
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1161
- Mon Aug 18, 2008 1:54 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: STG_MRG_10,0: Update record (0) of data set 6 is dropped;
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1879
As each "lookup" is performed in a Merge stage, the secondary record is consumed. This is documented behaviour and might be one of the reasons for using this stage type, to perform true master/update comparisons. That is why de-duplicated inputs are recommended. Sounds like you want a Lookup stage r...
- Mon Aug 18, 2008 1:52 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Record count to be sent in Dssendmail subroutine
- Replies: 9
- Views: 3038
- Mon Aug 18, 2008 1:50 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: How to define hardware configuration for 10 million records
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1509
- Mon Aug 18, 2008 1:49 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Fortune 500 companies using DataStage or Informatica
- Replies: 3
- Views: 6550
- Sun Aug 17, 2008 11:30 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Calling oracle procedure from DS routine
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1046
- Sun Aug 17, 2008 9:26 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Strange Server errors
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1347
- Sun Aug 17, 2008 3:22 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: not legal to set a reducer to be the same as a key field
- Replies: 6
- Views: 8197
- Sun Aug 17, 2008 12:21 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Solution approaches for table reformatting in datastage
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2827
- Sun Aug 17, 2008 12:03 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Solution approaches for table reformatting in datastage
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2827
OK. It can be done and fairly effiently. But it's still horrible. Perform a vertical pivot of your data to get the following columns, using stage variables as the pivoting technique. Group FN1 OV1 NV1 FN2 OV2 NV2 FN2 OV3 NV3 ----- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- B1 C1 a b C2 c d C3 e f Then use ...